[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: brute force and knowledge



At 12:03 PM 11/30/98 GMT, you wrote:
>Hi
>
>> >The brain isn't doing a lot of serial (eg. tree search) computation -
since
>> >pros can play fast, so it must be a big parallel evaluation.
>> >
>> >You don't see the parallel search because it is subconscious.  That's
why the
>> >pro's find it hard to say what made the move the best.  The search is
almost
>> >certainly some kind of pattern matching since that's what we excel at.
>> 
>> Can you redefine what you say?
>> 
>> LIttle confused here what you mean to express. 
>> I see clear difference between:
>>   'pattern matching' and 'parallel search'
>
>Please don't think that the only kind of search is alpha-beta pruned minimax.
>Certainly that's the best way for chess, but this is go.

Note that for chess this is wrong too; my chessprogram is nearly parallel
working. There are many chessprograms which work very well parallel.

>Think of search as just being "looking for the best move".
>
>Possibly pattern matching could be coupled with trying lots of random (or
>somehow directed) moves to find good shapes on the board.  ("Wouldn't
>it be nice if it looked like this?")  Then one could play the move that
>appears in most of the good shapes.
>
>The problem with a mechansitic pattern matching (one stimulus => one
response)
>is that one can get trapped in local maxima.  The player may need to allow
>the situation on the board to appear to deteriorate for a while in order
>to get to something even better.
>
>So imagine something like a continous process of (1) matching patterns all
>over the board, (2) trying (sequences of) random moves all over the board,
>(3) finding consistently good moves (4) using results of (3) to direct the
>moves tried in (2).  This is a parallel pattern matching search.  (Very
>similar to the simulated annealing go program mentioned earlier in this
>thread.)
>
>Notice there's no tree search here.  Just a process of finding moves likely
>to be good.  Those suggestions are then refered to the conscious brain for
>checking - by tree search.
>
>Regards
>John Clarke
>johnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>