[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1,1 point is bad?

To: Darren Cook <darren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 1,1 point is bad?
From: Robert Jasiek <jasiek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 10:28:45 +0200
Cc: computer-go@xxxxxx
Delivered-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <3.0.6.32.19990507143106.00b67820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jasiek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: computer-go-owner@xxxxxx

Darren Cook wrote:
> The other day on rec.games.go someone suggested that first move on the 1,1
> point could be the best move but we just don't understand enough to utilize
> it properly. I think it should be possible to disprove this.

Analysis of playing 1-1 has to consider a notion of capturable
living strings. For 1-1 as the first move this is ultimately
complex, see my earlier comments on the topic on rgg or on
http://www.snafu.de/~jasiek/j1989com.html
It is important to apply the exact rules.
So while I would not bet with God, I would bet ca. EUR 361^3^300:)

-- 
robert jasiek
http://www.snafu.de/~jasiek/

References:
- 1,1 point is bad?
  - From: Darren Cook

Prev by Date: Representation, results on defining a discussion goal
Next by Date: Re: f(x) and NN
Previous by thread: 1,1 point is bad?
Next by thread: Re: 1,1 point is bad?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread