[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Progress - OpenGo...

To: Jeffrey Greenberg <jgberg@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Progress - OpenGo...
From: Markus Enzenberger <markus.enzenberger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 13:52:15 +0200
Cc: computer-go@xxxxxx
Delivered-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <373A70B9.FA89FEB9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Jeffrey Greenberg on Wed, May 12, 1999 at 11:27:05PM -0700
References: <19990512221341.88177.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <373A70B9.FA89FEB9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: computer-go-owner@xxxxxx

On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 11:27:05PM -0700, Jeffrey Greenberg wrote:

> 4. how about a better test interface than the Go Modem Protocol, based on
> TCP/IP?

Just curious: is there anything wrong with using Go Modem Protocol
on TCP/IP?

- Markus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Progress - OpenGo...
  - From: Antti Huima

References:
- Re: Progress - OpenGo...
  - From: Imrich Kovac
- Re: Progress - OpenGo...
  - From: Jeffrey Greenberg

Prev by Date: Re: Progress - OpenGo...
Next by Date: Re: Progress - OpenGo...
Previous by thread: Re: Progress - OpenGo...
Next by thread: Re: Progress - OpenGo...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread