RE: computer-go: Re: David Elsdon assertion

["Sai To Wang" <stwang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	ANN is not what computer can do well, they only can patialy SIMULATED it,
an with a very limited nodos, and an ANN based hardware is another topic,
maybe a good approach to solve Go problem.

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]En nombre de P.J.L.Cuijpers
> Enviado el: Viernes, 12 de Noviembre de 1999 03:24 a.m.
> Para: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Asunto: Re: computer-go: Re: David Elsdon assertion
>
>
> > Is a real life experience a knowledge ??
> > I don´t think feeling is part of knowledge, is kind of
> sujective opinion.
>
> IMHO Knowledge is the information you use to be succesfull in your world
> in some way.
> If you mean "touch" by feeling then it is input, not knowledge.
> The remembrance of touch is knowledge I think.
> If you mean "a hunch of thought" or "the way my body reacts using
> hormones in a
> certain situation" then I think feeling certainly contains information
> to survive and
> therefore is some sort of knowledge. (Or meta-knowledge if you like)
>
> >>> "There is no inherent difference between the human brain and
> a computer system"
> > in my opinion, it can be true, only if you can prove that
> > human brain is a finite state system. I really don´t think so.
>
> Would you call an ANN a computer ?
> An ANN is not nescessarily a finite state system...
> (Of course most of the time ANN are SIMULATED on computers but you can
> build them as (analog) hardware as well.)