[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: Re: journal referees



> the two lists now are useful for the discussion, but let's be polite and
> not *nominate* anybody as a referee.

Hang on, I think I may have been slightly careless with my choice of
words.. the idea was to see if we can establish a list of people, not to
fix an editorial board :) You may be right though in that it was a bit
rash.

> I would like to first gain some kind of consensus on whether the whole
> idea is one to work forward or not, then on what kind of referee board

So how do we best proceed? What needs to be clarified? I'm inclined to
agree with Jeffrey Greenberg.. maybe it's best if we "just do it"?

Christian