[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: FPGA

To: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: computer-go: FPGA
From: Dave Dyer <ddyer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:03:41 -0700
Cc: Mike Gherrity <gherrity@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200008302256.PAA16513@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

At 03:56 PM 8/30/00, Mike Gherrity wrote:
>Hi Don,
>
>> Dave, I  am interested in why a  computer would get consistantly worse
>> results   with more computing  power  and   why  you believe it's  not
>> possible to fix.

I didn't claim that more cpu wouln't improve the search, only that
you couldn't guarantee that it would.  Since your evaliation is imperfect,
searching deeper or wider will show you different things, and you might
temporarily perfer an inferior move.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: computer-go: FPGA
  - From: Don Dailey

References:
- Re: computer-go: FPGA
  - From: Mike Gherrity

Prev by Date: Re: computer-go: FPGA
Next by Date: Re: computer-go: FPGA
Previous by thread: Re: computer-go: FPGA
Next by thread: Re: computer-go: FPGA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread