[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: computer-go: Please stop this pointless and blasphemous discussion !!!
Hi Roland,
First of all I want to apologize for coming on a little strong in my
email to you (the one you quoted from me.) Also, I see that you are a
reasonable person which I never doubted.
I'm not going to quote the last email (it keeps growing!) but I will
quote some excerpts from it and try to keep things brief.
> Well, the fact is that I guess most or many of the readers of this
> list belong to a western/Christian culture and should know about the
> implications and meaning that the word God has to many in our
> western/Christian culture. At least those who I am arguing with seem
> to be western judging from the names and e-mail addresses.
Most people use terms that are familiar to them and the audience they
expect to be listening. Now think about this. We are posting
technical material, on the INTERNET in English.
> Many understand tolerance as a one-way road. You demand that others be
> tolerant with the way you think, but you should understand that
> tolerance means also respecting other people's believes.
Respecting someone elses belief doesn't mean they are not allowed make
any references to it.
> DD> On top of that, "God" is about as generic as you can get. I seriously
> DD> doubt you will be able to tell the religion, or lack of from anyones
> DD> use of the word "GoGod."
>
> The term is generic for atheists who only have a concept in mind.
> For religious people the word God may have very specific meaning,
> depending of course on the religion and culture.
In a nutshell, we are drifting off topic which I KNOW will probably
start to offend people. But I'll say just this and then I promise to
shut up:
The word "god" is just a title. A lot of religions have multiple gods
with multiple names and with different characteristics. Even the
bible has tons of references to different gods. In fact, there is
much disagreement about whether the "main god" of the bible, Jehovah,
is really several rolled up in one (the trinity god), or just one God.
That's why I say this really is a generic term.
And yes, the term may in fact have very specific meaning to some
folks. But, and I stress this strongly, the context in which I used
the term should be crystal clear to anyone reading these posts.
> Well, after some posts, I begin to wonder if it was wise at all to
> start this arguing. Maybe I shouldn't have said anything, I don't know
> if it's really making any difference.
This "argument" has been remarkably civil. But I am feeling as you do
too, I'm sorry I got caught up in it and I know people are getting
sick of reading about it by now!
> Some people just become defensive and don't want to give up their way
> of thinking. I think the starting point was when someone wrote that he
> could win against God when having a pawn advantage in chess. This
> somehow really upset me and I couldn't restrain from writing something
> about the issue. Should I have kept my mouth shut? I really don't
> know...And I don't think that I am one of those who becomes easily
> offended.
To be honest, I flinched a little bit too at Vincents comment. But I
had no problem letting it pass, I know he meant no harm. I didn't get
the feeling he was "personalizing" this. He was really saying that he
felt a pawn is too big an advantage not to win with perfect play.
> After all you hear blasphemy everywhere, it just somehow makes you
> feel really bad if you have a personal believe. And now that I'm
> writing this lines I just remembered something: you certainly know
> about the good old "unsinkable" TITANIC. Well, I remember that shortly
> after it was finished someone claimed:"If this ship may sink? Not even
> GOD can sink this ship!" Hmmm, I wonder if at that time the TITANIC
> was the "perfect ship" for them. It didn't need God to sink the ship,
> a simple iceberg was enough. Nowadays people are more careful, you
> don't hear about unsinkable ships anymore.
Good analogy!
Don