[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: Winning strategy speculation and loosing games.

To: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: computer-go: Winning strategy speculation and loosing games.
From: Andre Engels <engels@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 18:39:13 +0200 (MET DST)
In-reply-to: <39D2B14D.3AB811E6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Yannick Delbecque at "Sep 27, 2000 10:53:25 pm"
Reply-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Yannick Delbecque wrote:

> Some recent comments made me wonder if anyone has tried to make "worst"
> go program. The task is not so obvious...It could probably be usefull in
> some way to help make good go programs. Maybe someone even tried to make
> a tournement of such bad go programs? 

It seems that any program that avoids making any eyes would be 'optimal'.

-- 
Andre Engels, engels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.win.tue.nl/~engels/index_en.html

If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise,
we don't believe in it at all			-- Noam Chomsky

Follow-Ups:
- Re: computer-go: Winning strategy speculation and loosing games.
  - From: Magnus Persson

References:
- computer-go: Winning strategy speculation and loosing games.
  - From: Yannick Delbecque

Prev by Date: Re: Re[2]: computer-go: perfect play
Next by Date: Re: Re[2]: computer-go: perfect play
Previous by thread: Re: computer-go: Winning strategy speculation and loosing games.
Next by thread: Re: computer-go: Winning strategy speculation and loosing games.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread