[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: Two ways to program a GO-engine



From: Nick Wedd
>Do we know that?  How do we know that?
>
>Suppose no-one had come up with the trick for winning at Nim.  You can
>imagine Nim programs that use tree searches, heuristics, detailed end-
>game analysis.  Then one day someone claps their hands and comes up with
>the trick about expressing the numbers in binary etc.
>
>I accept that something like this is improbable in Go.  But I don't know
>that it won't happen.


This is one occasion when it is useful to call on the theoretical result,
that Go is NP complete.  Therefore there cannot be this sort of hidden
secret, valid on boards of all sizes, depending only on computation linear
in the board size.

Charles
That means there is no good ALGORITHM for that. But it doesn't mean there is no WAY to do it. We just have to go beyond today's technology / way of thinking :)

Sorin

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.