[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: A problem with understanding lookahead



> The random algorithm plays very badly, but the point  is that is still
> plays MUCH BETTER than totally random moves.

Just a wondering: the "random evaluation function" must be deterministic in order for that to be true, isn't it? Deterministic in the meaning that for a given position it will return the same value every time, otherwise if the values change every time a position is evaluated (assuming no caching for the game tree) it doesn't seem to be possible to get something else than a random play...

regards, Vlad