[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: Second Order Liberties

To: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: computer-go: Second Order Liberties
From: Dave Dyer <ddyer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 18:35:35 -0700
In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.0.20020509161140.01d1fec0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <003a01c1f79b$d58c0740$6401a8c0@winxp><200205082110.OAA10393@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

there's a feature article about computer Go in a recent New Scientist.
Nothing remarkable, but they did get everything about right.  

The issue was Apr 13, 2002, title "Go For It"

www.newscientist.com click on "archives" and take a 7 day free
subscription to read the article.

http://archive.newscientist.com/archive.jsp?id=23385000

References:
- computer-go: Second Order Liberties
  - From: Chris Fant
- Re: computer-go: Bad Tactical move in MFG
  - From: uzsxtn
- Re: computer-go: Second Order Liberties
  - From: David Fotland

Prev by Date: Re: computer-go: Second Order Liberties
Next by Date: Re: computer-go: Second Order Liberties
Previous by thread: SV: computer-go: Re: Joseki and Fuseki
Next by thread: Re: computer-go: Second Order Liberties
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread