[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: Bad Tactical move in MFG

To: <computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: computer-go: Bad Tactical move in MFG
From: "Chris Fant" <fantius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 15:36:08 -0400
References: <6D259B2A9E733043B2D8567C82C2FEF931AB03@uspalx23> <00a401c1f84d$e12b8320$6401a8c0@winxp>
Reply-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The way this issue can about is I remember hearing that a single stone stone
surrounded on three sides with it's only liberty two spaces away from the
edge was provably dead, but I don't see that.  That is how the files I sent
start out, but we see that black lives.  Did I make an incorrect move for
white somewhere?  Is is it not true that black is provably dead in that
starting configuration?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: computer-go: Bad Tactical move in MFG
  - From: Daniel Bump

References:
- RE: computer-go: Bad Tactical move in MFG
  - From: Grajdeanu, Adrian
- Re: computer-go: Bad Tactical move in MFG
  - From: Chris Fant

Prev by Date: Re: RE: computer-go: Bad Tactical move in MFG
Next by Date: Re: computer-go: Bad Tactical move in MFG
Previous by thread: Re: computer-go: Bad Tactical move in MFG
Next by thread: Re: computer-go: Bad Tactical move in MFG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread