Re: [computer-go] finishing game on KGS

["R. Zhou" <shanleqi@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Gunnar Farnebäck <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Personally I prefer the following setup, which gives
> me the best of
> both worlds (the difference between IGS and NNGS is
> not conceptually
> important here):
> 
>               open
> --------    protocol    ---------------      GTP    
>  ----------
> | NNGS |  <---------->  | gnugoclient |  <--------->
>  | GNU Go |
> --------                ---------------             
>  ----------
> 


I am an amateur++. If something like GTP is inserted
between the Go robot and the server, and GTP does not
allow you send "match" command actively, that's not
fun. 

Probably, something like GTP is more useful in
organizing competitions. But existing IGS can do this
too. For me, it seems that I have to climb different
walls to achieve different standards set by differet
people. And those walls are not relevant to Go
programming.

Again, I am an amateur++. (I am even confused about
the term "client".  Can GoWind be called a client? an
engine? or both? or a blend of everything or nothing
that's laughable to real programmers?) Any opinion of
mine may be ridiculous. Please forgive me.

Ruhai





		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/