Re: [computer-go] Hardware-Instruction.

[Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ulf Lorenz is correct.

At clusters MPI is the only way to go.



At 17:15 6-11-2004 +0100, chrilly wrote:
>>
>>I'm tempted to see how quickly I can convert my current program to Cilk,
>>and what the performance result of that would be.
>>
>According my feeling is Cilk more high level than e.g. MPI. It is easier
>converting an existing programm to a parallel version with Cilk than with
>MPI. I assume (but have never done any concrete tests or studies) that this
>high-level comes with a price. MPI is probably faster and more flexible.
>Hydra runs on a distributed Cluster. As far as I know (it is a more a guess,
>than knowledge) is such an architecture also not supported by Cilk.
>In case of Hydra the decision was taken as follows: I asked the parallel
>expert Ulf Lorenz: What library, model shall we use? "MPI". Is Cilk not an
>interesting alternative? It looks quite easy to port with Cilk: "No". Okay,
>lets do with MPI.
>
>Chrilly
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>computer-go mailing list
>computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/