Re: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory

[Don Dailey <drd@xxxxxxx>]

> Regarding the probability of winning, I will second Antti Huima. The
> fact that a given position is a game theoretic win is not a
> probability. A position is either a win or a loss (even if you don't
> know it, which is another point).

I never occured to me that someone would think I actually meant that
because we were talking about imperfect evaluation functions.  But
I admit I SAID that because I was being sloppy!

- Don

_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/