Re: [computer-go] future KGS Computer Go Tournaments - two sections?

[Michal Bazynski <bazik@xxxxxx>]

On Wed, 11 May 2005, Nick Wedd wrote:

> In message <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505111121150.26140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Bazynski 
> <bazik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> > what is MFoG's chance of winning? 70? nope, it has come down to 50%. 3 
> > copies of GNU's and its down to 35%. and all that time MFoG is clearly best 
> > - 70% winning chance or better against every other opponent.
> Yes, it's clearly best to you, and to all readers of this mailing list. But 
> it is no longer clearly best to the marketing guy in the Japanese company 
> that David Fotland is negotiating with.
my point exactly.

> > what would make it fair is if MFoG could enter as many copies as GNU-based 
> > folks can.
> This is what I am proposing.  What do you think that number should be? I 
> think the obvious answer is "1".
to me the answer is 1. i was just trying to explain why "2" for gnu-based, 
and "1" for many faces is unfair.

and as to your vision of 2 divisions, i like it in every detail.

mike
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/