RE: [computer-go] future KGS Computer Go Tournaments - two sections?

[Christoph Birk <birk@xxxxxxxx>]

David Fotland wrote:
> Now let's suppose that instead of 10 copies of Gnugo, the tournament has 10
> programs that are minor derivatives of gnugo with similar playing strength.
> I think it's obvious that this is equally unfair.

But what if the derivative is 4 stones stronger? How can you call
that minor, even if only 1% of "time" was necessary? 

Christoph
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/