[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Go program strength

To: Tim Hunt <T.J.Hunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Go program strength
From: Nick Wedd <Nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 18:36:22 +0000
Cc: computer-go@xxxxxx, Compgo123@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990209092845.416A-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AUQ5isC7Q3v2EwpM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.3.96.990209092845.416A-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nick Wedd <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: computer-go-owner@xxxxxx

Tim Hunt <T.J.Hunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes

>There is also the theory that since the Computer Ing Cup and simmilar
>events are the main testing ground for go programs, the programs are
>designed to perform well there, rather than against humans. What do people
>here think about that? Is it just slander, or is there some truth in it?

I think that there is truth in this.

Nick
-- 
Nick Wedd    nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: Go program strength
  - From: Nick Wedd
- Re: Go program strength
  - From: Tim Hunt

Prev by Date: Re: Go program strength
Next by Date: Re[2]: Go program strength
Previous by thread: Re: Go program strength
Next by thread: Re: Go program strength
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread