Mail Index

• Thread Index

• [computer-go] Tools for batch computer vs. computer play
  • From: mpe501
• [computer-go] Tools for batch computer vs. computer play
  • From: mpe501
• Re: [computer-go] Weights are very important
  • From: Robin Kramer
• Re: [computer-go] Weights are very important
  • From: Nicol N. Schraudolph
• Re: [computer-go] Weights are very important
  • From: William Harold Newman
• Re: [computer-go] Weights are very important
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen
• Re: [computer-go] finding groups as an image segmentation problem
  • From: Robin Kramer
• Re: [computer-go] A potential use for neural networks in Go
  • From: matth1
• [computer-go] A potential use for neural networks in Go
  • From: Robin Kramer
• Re: [computer-go] Weights are very important
  • From: Nicol N. Schraudolph
• [computer-go] Weights are very important
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen
• [computer-go] CGF special meeting 2004 result
  • From: Hiroshi Yamashita
• Re: [computer-go] double threats
  • From: Mark Boon
• Re: [computer-go] finding groups as an image segmentation problem
  • From: Compgo123
• Re: [computer-go] finding groups as an image segmentation problem
  • From: Markus Enzenberger
• Re: [computer-go] Re: Weights are not very important was: ANNsas potentially useful in the computer goproblem
  • From: David Fotland
• Re: [computer-go] ANNs as potentially useful in the computergoproblem...
  • From: Don Dailey
• [computer-go] finding groups as an image segmentation problem
  • From: Robin Kramer
• Re: [computer-go] ANNs as potentially useful in the computergoproblem...
  • From: Myriam Abramson
• Re: [computer-go] Neural Networks in C++ -- Recommendations?
  • From: Myriam Abramson
• [computer-go] Re: Weights are not very important was: ANNs aspotentially useful in the computer goproblem
  • From: chrilly
• Re: [computer-go] Re: Re: Re: double threats
  • From: David Fotland
• Re: [computer-go] ANNs as potentially useful in the computergoproblem...
  • From: David Fotland
• [computer-go] Re: Re: Re: double threats
  • From: Jens Lieberum
• Re: [computer-go] Re: double threats
  • From: David Fotland
• RE: [computer-go] Re: double threats
  • From: Anders Kierulf
• [computer-go] Re: double threats
  • From: Jens Lieberum
• Re: [computer-go] double threats
  • From: David Fotland
• Re: [computer-go] double threats
  • From: Darren Cook
• RE: [computer-go] double threats
  • From: David Fotland
• [computer-go] Data Mining Stratogy
  • From: KANE Aaron
• Re: [computer-go] double threats
  • From: matth1
• Re: [computer-go] double threats
  • From: Erik van der Werf
• RE: [computer-go] double threats
  • From: Anders Kierulf
• [computer-go] double threats
  • From: Jens Lieberum
• Re: [computer-go] inside and outside influence
  • From: Bruno Bouzy
• Re: [computer-go] inside and outside influence
  • From: Erik van der Werf
• Re: [computer-go] CA for Life & Death
  • From: matth1
• Re: [computer-go] CA for Life & Death
  • From: Michael Reiss
• [computer-go] CA for Life & Death
  • From: matth1
• Re: [computer-go] Neural Networks in C -- Recommendations?
  • From: matth1
• [computer-go] Neural Networks in C++ -- Recommendations?
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: [computer-go] Evaluation speed
  • From: David Fotland
• Re: [computer-go] Stages of the game
  • From: Martin Mueller
• Re: [computer-go] Stages of the game
  • From: matth1
• [computer-go] Stages of the game
  • From: Robin Kramer
• Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?
  • From: Robin Kramer
• [computer-go] Evaluation speed
  • From: Antoine de Maricourt
• Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?
  • From: Compgo123
• Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?
  • From: Robin Kramer
• Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?
  • From: Compgo123
• Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?
  • From: Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Heuristics Search and Learning
  • From: Robin Kramer
• Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?
  • From: matth1
• Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?
  • From: Nicol N. Schraudolph
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetriesinneuralnetworks
  • From: Nicol N. Schraudolph
• Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?
  • From: Erik van der Werf
• Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?
  • From: matth1
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks
  • From: matth1
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries inneuralnetworks
  • From: Frank Steinmann
• [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?
  • From: chrilly
• Re: [computer-go] Learning and Go
  • From: Max Laager
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: [computer-go] Java like object tree in C++
  • From: Evan Berggren Daniel
• Re: [computer-go] Java like object tree in C++
  • From: Darren Cook
• [computer-go] Java like object tree in C++
  • From: KANE Aaron
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetriesinneuralnetworks
  • From: Frank Steinmann
• Re: [computer-go] Has go been completely solved for any sizes of thegoban?
  • From: David Schneider-Joseph
• Re: [computer-go] Has go been completely solved for any sizes of thegoban?
  • From: Martin Moller Pedersen
• Re: [computer-go] Has go been completely solved for any sizes ofthe goban?
  • From: Robert Jasiek
• Re: [computer-go] Has go been completely solved for any sizesof the goban?
  • From: David Fotland
• [computer-go] Has go been completely solved for any sizes of thegoban?
  • From: mpe501
• Re: [computer-go] Learning and Go
  • From: David Fotland
• [computer-go] Learning and Go
  • From: Robin Kramer
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks
  • From: Derek James
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetriesinneuralnetworks
  • From: Frank Steinmann
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries inneuralnetworks
  • From: Nicol N. Schraudolph
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks
  • From: Adrian Grajdeanu
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries inneuralnetworks
  • From: Frank Steinmann
• Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks
  • From: Nicol N. Schraudolph
• [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks
  • From: Frank Steinmann
• Re: [computer-go] Parallel lookahead with GNU Go
  • From: david doshay
• Re: [computer-go] Parallel lookahead with GNU Go
  • From: Gunnar Farnebäck
• Re: [computer-go] Parallel lookahead with GNU Go
  • From: Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Parallel lookahead with GNU Go
  • From: david doshay
• [computer-go] List works again
  • From: the Robot Vegetable
• [computer-go] TEST: I have reports of STILL bouncing (fwd)
  • From: the Robot Vegetable
• [computer-go] Re: list broken?
  • From: the Robot Vegetable
• [computer-go] test - list down?
  • From: the Robot Vegetable
• [computer-go] Tactical search or not in computer go
  • From: magnus.persson
• Re: [computer-go] 9x9 programs?
  • From: Evan Berggren Daniel
• Re: [computer-go] 9x9 programs?
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] Ratings
  • From: Erik van der Werf
• Re: Parallel Go (was Re: [computer-go] A chess programmer at theGo-Olympiad)
  • From: Compgo123
• [computer-go] 9x9 programs?
  • From: Evan Berggren Daniel
• Re: [computer-go] A chess programmer at the Go-Olympiad
  • From: David Fotland
• [computer-go] Ratings
  • From: Robin Kramer
• [computer-go] ADMIN in regards to posting from non subscribedaddresses
  • From: the Robot Vegetable
• Re: [computer-go] A chess programmer at the Go-Olympiad
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Parallel Go (was Re: [computer-go] A chess programmer at theGo-Olympiad)
  • From: david doshay