[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: 10 years is nothing.

To: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: computer-go: 10 years is nothing.
From: Ray Tayek <rtayek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 17:01:50 -0700
In-reply-to: <3.0.5.32.20001002182403.007bfdb0@fmt1>
References: <200010021431.KAA07781@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><166599812.20000924142530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

At 06:24 PM 10/2/2000 +0200, you wrote:

...
I could have written down that statement in 1988. In that year I made
a bet with Robert Rehm about the year 2000. My opinion was:

"in the year 2000 a computer program can with black and 9 stones handicap
beat Robert Rehm (european 5 dan)"

I am going to loose this bet with a wide margin, unless someone can
provide me with a program before 21rst of october 2000.

we probably need at least another 10 years. its too easy for dan level player to keep things sufficiently unsettled for a long time.

hth

---
ray tayek http://home.earthlink.net/~rtayek/
orange county java users group http://www.ocjug.org/
want privacy? http://www.freedom.net/
hate spam? http://samspade.org/ssw/

References:
- Re: computer-go: Two ways to program a GO-engine
  - From: Don Dailey
- computer-go: Two ways to program a GO-engine
  - From: Roland
- computer-go: 10 years is nothing.
  - From: P.Y.J. Zandveld

Prev by Date: Re: computer-go: perfect play
Next by Date: Re: computer-go: board reduction
Previous by thread: Re: computer-go: 10 years is nothing.
Next by thread: Re: computer-go: Two ways to program a GO-engine
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread