Re: computer-go: Example of Good Core Rules of Play for CG

[Nick Wedd <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In message <3B37345C.FFF2D85C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Jasiek <jasiek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
writes
>
>
>Nick Wedd wrote:
>>     Chinese scoring
>>     no suicide
>>     6.5 komi
>>     Standard ko
>>     See URL........ for further details.
>
>I have no problem with such a procedure:)
> 
>> Experience suggests that s/he will never actually read the URL.
>
>Those who do not read the rules have no reason to complain
>if opposing programs use that fact by arcane strategies...
>OTOH, if you offer a short list only, then you should also
>include essential remarks like
>
>end = 2 passes, then game scored as is

"end = 2 passes" I understand.

"game scored as is" I do not understand.  Scored by whom?  Using what
procedure?  I think I recall that you disapproved of the method I used
in MSO4.

Nick
-- 
Nick Wedd