[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: Most simple Go rules

To: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: computer-go: Most simple Go rules
From: Nick Wedd <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:44:28 +0100
In-reply-to: <3B401302.1AA97ACB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4.2.0.58.20010701213421.00ce3e60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><3B401302.1AA97ACB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In message <3B401302.1AA97ACB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Jasiek <jasiek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
writes

>Ray Tayek wrote:
>> >  "No position may ever repeat"
>> >is simpler ...
>> is it really that simple? iirc, there is some additional qualification like
>> the scores must also be the same? or perhaps i am condfused?
>
>You are confused:) When the score applies, then a superko rule
>has already stopped being applied.

If you read "difference in prisoner count" for "score", then Ray's
question is a sensible one.

Nick
-- 
Nick Wedd

Follow-Ups:
- Re: computer-go: Most simple Go rules
  - From: Robert Jasiek

References:
- Re: computer-go: Most simple Go rules
  - From: Ray Tayek
- Re: computer-go: Most simple Go rules
  - From: Robert Jasiek

Prev by Date: Re: computer-go: Engineering (was: Most simple Go rules)
Next by Date: RE: computer-go: Scoring
Previous by thread: Re: computer-go: Most simple Go rules
Next by thread: Re: computer-go: Most simple Go rules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread