Gunnar wrote:
> and the basic problem is that the connection analysis is not
> sophisticated enough to understand whether the seki strings have
> access to outside eyes. (It thinks they have and therefore the two
> eyes are considered territory.)
Thanks for the interesting example. This restriction is natural since the bamboo joints do not fully enclose the seki area.
> If dame filling is required the problem becomes substantially simpler,
> and less interesting.
What is very good in the CGoban2 procedure is that filling all playable dame is not required. Seki is recognized as soon as all territory and seki portions of the board are delimited by stones.
--
Jean-Pierre Vesinet
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go