RE: [computer-go] Score estimating

["David Fotland" <fotland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Do you have a reference for your 30% higher productivity number?  I'm
surprised
that there is that much difference in productivity among any high level
language.

David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: computer-go-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:computer-go-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Weimin Xiao
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 7:12 AM
> To: drd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; computer-go
> Subject: Re: [computer-go] Score estimating
> 
> 
> >From my experience, Java is about 30% slower than C++ running in 
> >byte-code
> mode. However, if compiled Java program into native 
> executables (not the simple exe wrapper), the gap is only at 
> about 10%. Comparing the computer speed increase is much more 
> than 10% in half year, and programming efficiency using Java 
> is at least 30% higher than C++, write GO program in Java is 
> a better choise than in C++.
> 
> Weimin
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Don Dailey" <drd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 7:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [computer-go] Score estimating
> 
> 
> 
> Chrilly,
> 
> I'm no  expert on  this but I  think speed  is always 
> critical  in any game.  Speed and memory are  to computers 
> what intelligence is to man. .. I think what you  are seeing 
> with Java is not that  it is suited to go programming, it's 
> just very popular.  It's not particularly expressive OR fast, 
> but it's a good  compromise in both directions. ..
> 
> - Don
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
> 

_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/