Re: Superko detection (was Re: [computer-go] M.Boon-Library)

[Erik van der Werf <e.vanderwerf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Frank de Groot wrote:
> > That may depend on what you're doing. GNU Go is doing fairly well
> > without any superko checks. It has been on the TODO list for ages but
> > nobody has found it important or fun enough to implement so far.
>
> I thought that when doing MadLab- / GoTools-like L&D search, that 
> SuperKo was important tot check for as pruning contraint? When 
> generating the movetree, would you otherwise not generate a lot of 
> superko situations?
>
> Anyone knows?
It depends on the rules. If you want to know more about superko-issues 
and some possible solutions read my icga article and recent articles of 
Kishimoto.

E.
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/