RE: [computer-go] Pattern Matcher

[Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with the fact that C# and JAVA are in the same league and that JAVA
is a bit grown up more, but that C# has better interface possibilities.

diep3d for example is in MFC now and C# allows easier constructions for that.

However we cannot afford a factor 3 slowdown.

So the program is entirely C++ with some C code here and there from my side.

At 21:25 8-11-2004 -0200, Mark Boon wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: computer-go-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:computer-go-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Don Dailey
>> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 20:48
>> To: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [computer-go] Pattern Matcher
>>
>>    A complex program will be a factor 3 slower with it at least.
>
>Quite the opposite, see below.
>
>
>>    In fact small 30 line programs already are to my amazement not
>> seldom up to
>>    a factor 3 slower.
>>
>
>Actually, this IS quite true. Small Java programs perform relatively poorly
>when not run sufficiently long. This is because you get hit by the
>class-loader and the JIT-compiler which needs to compile the code. Once
>they're done, it runs fast.
>
>_______________________________________________
>computer-go mailing list
>computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/