[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [computer-go] Pattern matching - example play



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Dailey [mailto:drd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
 
> I guess  I'm saying that if  I wanted to  become a master in  chess, I
> could  do  this on  my  own  by  playing tournaments,  reading  books,
> studying games and especially analyzing my own games.  But if I wanted
> to become a  master FAST, I would  have to do all of  those things and
> additionally hire  the right teacher.   (Find the "right"  teacher may
> not be easy.)

Good that we agree!

After reaching 2 dan 10 years ago I have not improved (perhaps I am
stronger in the fundamentals of the game - compensated by forgetting a
lot of stuff that were simple memorization).

I think the strong teacher option is what I need.

Still my point here is that there is always a bottleneck in what a
teacher can communicate to a student. The teacher is not aware of all
processing his brain actually does. And furthermore it is not enough for
the student to simply remember what is communicated, it is more a slow
reorganization of how go positions are processed.

--
Magnus Persson
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/