[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [computer-go] Pattern matching - example play
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Dailey [mailto:drd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> I guess I'm saying that if I wanted to become a master in chess, I
> could do this on my own by playing tournaments, reading books,
> studying games and especially analyzing my own games. But if I wanted
> to become a master FAST, I would have to do all of those things and
> additionally hire the right teacher. (Find the "right" teacher may
> not be easy.)
Good that we agree!
After reaching 2 dan 10 years ago I have not improved (perhaps I am
stronger in the fundamentals of the game - compensated by forgetting a
lot of stuff that were simple memorization).
I think the strong teacher option is what I need.
Still my point here is that there is always a bottleneck in what a
teacher can communicate to a student. The teacher is not aware of all
processing his brain actually does. And furthermore it is not enough for
the student to simply remember what is communicated, it is more a slow
reorganization of how go positions are processed.
--
Magnus Persson
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/