[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [computer-go] Computer Go tournament at EGF



Richard Brown wrote:

Furthermore, the number of go positions one would have to store is
larger than the (finite) number of atomic particles in the universe,
so even if there were an _infinite_ amount of time (which there isn't,
because the universe does have an age) there isn't enough storage
space to keep track of the results.
This is not true. We can reasonably expect perfect playing strategies that
finish the game within a thousand ply. A search of the gametree to a depth
of 1000 takes no more than 1000*1000 bytes.

Such problems -- those that require a longer time than the age of the
universe, or that require more storage than the number of atomic
particles in the universe are called "inherently intractable".
And that's why _not_even_ brute-force will work.  It is _NOT_ possible.
The assertion that it is "easy to write a perfect go program given no
time constraints" is simply not true.
Not even theoretically.
It's easy to write such a program, even under the time constraint of one
week:-) Running the program is also easy in theory; it will terminate within
1000^1000 "steps". This is only a *practical* impossibility in our shortlived
universe.

regards,
-John
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/