That pretty much sums up my thoughts on the matter too.i couldn't agree more. i always thought this is what was being proposed all along, and couldn't understand what problems people see...Since everyone else is taking a stab at this, here is mine: 1. When B, W both pass, request final_status_list 2. If the results are same, we are done 3. If not, start requesting gen_move_cleanup (if it is not implemented, assume a pass move) 4. After two more passes, all blocks are assumed alive.YES. This is, in my opinion, exactly how it should be.
how is this different from wms protocol by the way?_________________________________________________________________
and as to Don's previous mail - is undo sent to one of the programs on disagreement after 2 passes? if so how is it that the undo command does not have to be implemented, according to kgsgtp doc?
oh, and as to 'assume everything is alive after 2 passes' - i would really like to be able to have the same bot play against humans, and against other bots... and humans are _not_ thrilled with a bot believing in kill all before passing approach...
> - Donmike _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/