[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Go program strength

To: computer-go@xxxxxx
Subject: Re: Go program strength
From: Thomas Goodsell <slvhh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 21:48:13 +0000
Organization: Utah State University
References: <cbd311a9.36c0d65e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <36C1C49F.8D1C492A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <36C1C77F.640BA7F1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: thom.goodsell@xxxxxxx
Sender: thomg@xxxxxxxxxx

I don't mean to suggest that tweaking a program is unethical (I believe
it's perfectly acceptable), but one counter argument is that the program
is tweaked by others making hardwired changes to the algorithms and
exectional cases, rather than by Deep Blue (or whichever) looking at
records of its next opponenet's past games.

My $0.02

Thom Goodsell
thom.goodsell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://cc.usu.edu/~slvhh/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Go program strength
  - From: Dan Stromberg

References:
- Re: Go program strength
  - From: Compgo123
- Re: Go program strength
  - From: Elmer Elevator
- Re: Go program strength
  - From: Ray Easton

Prev by Date: Re: Go program strength
Next by Date: Re: Go program strength
Previous by thread: Re: Go program strength
Next by thread: Re: Go program strength
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread