Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: [computer-go] A potential use for neural networks in Go, (continued)
  • Re: [computer-go] A potential use for neural networks in Go, matth1
• [computer-go] Weights are very important, Vincent Diepeveen
  • Re: [computer-go] Weights are very important, Nicol N. Schraudolph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [computer-go] Weights are very important, Vincent Diepeveen
    • Re: [computer-go] Weights are very important, William Harold Newman
      • Re: [computer-go] Weights are very important, Robin Kramer
  • Re: [computer-go] Weights are very important, Nicol N. Schraudolph
• [computer-go] CGF special meeting 2004 result, Hiroshi Yamashita
• [computer-go] finding groups as an image segmentation problem, Robin Kramer
  • Re: [computer-go] finding groups as an image segmentation problem, Markus Enzenberger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [computer-go] finding groups as an image segmentation problem, Compgo123
    • Re: [computer-go] finding groups as an image segmentation problem, Robin Kramer
• [computer-go] Re: Weights are not very important was: ANNs aspotentially useful in the computer goproblem, chrilly
  • Re: [computer-go] Re: Weights are not very important was: ANNsas potentially useful in the computer goproblem, David Fotland
• Re: [computer-go] ANNs as potentially useful in the computergoproblem..., David Fotland
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [computer-go] ANNs as potentially useful in the computergoproblem..., Myriam Abramson
    • Re: [computer-go] ANNs as potentially useful in the computergoproblem..., Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Re: Re: double threats, Jens Lieberum
  • Re: [computer-go] Re: Re: Re: double threats, David Fotland
• [computer-go] Re: double threats, Jens Lieberum
  • RE: [computer-go] Re: double threats, Anders Kierulf
  • Re: [computer-go] Re: double threats, David Fotland
• [computer-go] double threats, Jens Lieberum
  • RE: [computer-go] double threats, Anders Kierulf
    • RE: [computer-go] double threats, David Fotland
      • Re: [computer-go] double threats, Darren Cook
      • Re: [computer-go] double threats, David Fotland
      • Re: [computer-go] double threats, Mark Boon
  • Re: [computer-go] double threats, Erik van der Werf
  • [computer-go] Data Mining Stratogy, KANE Aaron
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [computer-go] double threats, matth1
• [computer-go] CA for Life & Death, matth1
  • Re: [computer-go] CA for Life & Death, Michael Reiss
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [computer-go] CA for Life & Death, matth1
• Re: [computer-go] Neural Networks in C -- Recommendations?, matth1
• [computer-go] Neural Networks in C++ -- Recommendations?, Thomas Johnson
  • Re: [computer-go] Neural Networks in C++ -- Recommendations?, Myriam Abramson
• [computer-go] Stages of the game, Robin Kramer
  • Re: [computer-go] Stages of the game, Martin Mueller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [computer-go] Stages of the game, matth1
• [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?, chrilly
  • Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?, Erik van der Werf
  • Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?, Nicol N. Schraudolph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?, matth1
  • Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?, matth1
    • [computer-go] Heuristics Search and Learning, Robin Kramer
    • Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?, Don Dailey
  • Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?, Compgo123
    • Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?, Robin Kramer
      • [computer-go] Evaluation speed, Antoine de Maricourt
      • Re: [computer-go] Evaluation speed, David Fotland
  • Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?, Compgo123
    • Re: [computer-go] Purpose of Neural-Nets?, Robin Kramer
• [computer-go] Has go been completely solved for any sizes of thegoban?, mpe501
  • Re: [computer-go] Has go been completely solved for any sizesof the goban?, David Fotland
    • Re: [computer-go] Has go been completely solved for any sizes ofthe goban?, Robert Jasiek
      • Re: [computer-go] Has go been completely solved for any sizes of thegoban?, Martin Moller Pedersen
      • Re: [computer-go] Has go been completely solved for any sizes of thegoban?, David Schneider-Joseph
• [computer-go] Learning and Go, Robin Kramer
  • Re: [computer-go] Learning and Go, David Fotland
  • Re: [computer-go] Learning and Go, Max Laager
• [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks, Frank Steinmann
  • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks, Nicol N. Schraudolph
    • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries inneuralnetworks, Frank Steinmann
      • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries inneuralnetworks, Nicol N. Schraudolph
      • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetriesinneuralnetworks, Frank Steinmann
      • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetriesinneuralnetworks, Frank Steinmann
      • [computer-go] Java like object tree in C++, KANE Aaron
      • Re: [computer-go] Java like object tree in C++, Darren Cook
      • Re: [computer-go] Java like object tree in C++, Evan Berggren Daniel
      • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetriesinneuralnetworks, Nicol N. Schraudolph
    • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks, Adrian Grajdeanu
  • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks, Derek James
  • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks, Thomas Johnson
    • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries inneuralnetworks, Frank Steinmann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [computer-go] taking advantage of board symmetries in neuralnetworks, matth1
• [computer-go] Parallel lookahead with GNU Go, david doshay
  • Re: [computer-go] Parallel lookahead with GNU Go, Don Dailey
    • Re: [computer-go] Parallel lookahead with GNU Go, david doshay
  • Re: [computer-go] Parallel lookahead with GNU Go, Gunnar Farnebäck
• [computer-go] List works again, the Robot Vegetable
• [computer-go] TEST: I have reports of STILL bouncing (fwd), the Robot Vegetable
• [computer-go] Re: list broken?, the Robot Vegetable
• [computer-go] test - list down?, the Robot Vegetable
• Re: Parallel Go (was Re: [computer-go] A chess programmer at theGo-Olympiad), Compgo123
• [computer-go] 9x9 programs?, Evan Berggren Daniel
  • Re: [computer-go] 9x9 programs?, Don Dailey
    • Re: [computer-go] 9x9 programs?, Evan Berggren Daniel
• [computer-go] Ratings, Robin Kramer
  • Re: [computer-go] Ratings, Erik van der Werf
• [computer-go] ADMIN in regards to posting from non subscribedaddresses, the Robot Vegetable
• [computer-go] TSgfParser, a Delphi component., Joachim Pimiskern
• [computer-go] Re: Chess Programmer at the Olympiad, chrilly
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [computer-go] Re: Chess Programmer at the Olympiad, Compgo123
• [computer-go] the scaling chess <==> go, Vincent Diepeveen
• Re: [computer-go] chess and go ratings, Vincent Diepeveen
• Re: [computer-go] FPGA, Compgo123
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [computer-go] FPGA, chrilly
    • Re: [computer-go] FPGA, David Fotland
      • Re: [computer-go] FPGA, Don Dailey