[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: Example of Good Core Rules of Play for CG

To: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: computer-go: Example of Good Core Rules of Play for CG
From: John Tromp <tromp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:57:13 -0400
In-reply-to: <bK+$s1UIG3N7EwOo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 06:14:48PM +0100
References: <Z4WfgrRrT0N7EwcT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200106251554.LAA19373@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bK+$s1UIG3N7EwOo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

> In Ing2000, some programs made pointless moves inside secure enemy
> territory, and eventually built live groups there.  I will not be
> surprised if one day I see a program make a pointless suicide move, in
> the hope of getting a win by forfeit.

Sure, that may help it get a few wins and avoid ending last, but it won't
do much for its chances to beat the likes of ManyFaces and finish in the top3:)

-john

References:
- Re: computer-go: Example of Good Core Rules of Play for CG
  - From: Nick Wedd
- Re: computer-go: Example of Good Core Rules of Play for CG
  - From: Don Dailey
- Re: computer-go: Example of Good Core Rules of Play for CG
  - From: Nick Wedd

Prev by Date: Re: computer-go: Most simple Go rules
Next by Date: RE: computer-go: Most simple Go rules
Previous by thread: Re: computer-go: Example of Good Core Rules of Play for CG
Next by thread: computer-go: Shape of stones and territory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread