[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [computer-go] chess and go ratings
Very nice analysis. Thanks.
I think your are right about the Go scale being wider than the chess
scale. But it's difficult to prove because GO doesn't use anything
like ELO.
A friend of mine who was a very strong chess player (international
master) and also loved GO, felt there were more "levels" of competence
in Go.
In order to understand this, we need to know how many ELO levels
there are in GO. My friend believed that if you used an ELO system
with the "average player" centered at 1500 like in chess, the top
players would have much higher ELO ratings than the top chess players.
I assume that's what you mean by "wider."
- Don
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:27:03 +0100
From: Jerome Abela <jerome.abela@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:07:14 -0800
X-BeenThere: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: computer-go <computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Id: computer-go <computer-go.computer-go.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go>,
<mailto:computer-go-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go>
List-Post: <mailto:computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Help: <mailto:computer-go-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go>,
<mailto:computer-go-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
Sender: computer-go-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:58:40PM +0000, Nick Wedd wrote:
> >Even though my chess level is comparable to 2nd dan professional in chess
> >though, the only real advantage i might have at a 9x9 go board, is that it
> >has just 64 squares which i am used to.
>
> How do you compare chess levels with go ratings? Can you give the Elo
> number corresponding to amateur 1-dan? or the go grade corresponding to
> "strong club player"? As press officer of the British Go Association
> people sometimes ask me this, and I don't know how to give a helpful
> answer.
100 Elo = 0.69 winning expectancy = 1 Go grade
But the Go scale is wider than the chess scale. Here are two
ways to compare both scales.
If you align on the beginners, you get the following table, which
only shows how the Go scale is wider than its chess counterpart,
but is meaningless as an equivalence table:
Chess Go
Total beginner 1000 Elo 20 Kyu Total beginner
Typical club player 1500 Elo 15 Kyu
2000 Elo 10 Kyu Typical club player
2500 Elo 5 Kyu Typical club player
Maximum reachable 3000 Elo 1 Dan
3500 Elo 6 Dan
4000 Elo 9 Pro World champions
If you scale the scales, you can get a feeling of how strong
someone is by comparing to the other game:
Total beginner 1000 Elo 20 Kyu Total beginner
Typical club player 1300 Elo 15 Kyu
Typical club player 1600 Elo 10 Kyu Typical club player
Typical club player 1900 Elo 5 Kyu Typical club player
2200 Elo 1 Dan
Intl GrandMaster 2500 Elo 6 Dan Best european players
World champions 2800 Elo 9 Pro World champions
Jerome.
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go