You simply have not understood what my pattern system is and what it does,
and immediately saying that it is highly inferior in usefulness to a L&D
solver is simply naive. Both are important. I am pretty sure that my system
is much more important, as my system allows to predict 20% of all pro moves
in unseen games and it takes a few microseconds per move to do that. And,
in a few weeks to months, it will predict 40% of pro moves, when things go
well.
A jump from 20% to 40%: my guess is this is better than the pros would do:
33% would imply there are three moves that a pro cannot confidently
distinguish between, and from the commentated games I've watched that is
very common.