[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [computer-go] Modern brute force search

To: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Modern brute force search
From: Christoph Birk <birk@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go>
List-help: <mailto:computer-go-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-id: computer-go <computer-go.computer-go.org>
List-post: <mailto:computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-subscribe: <http://hosting.midvalleyhosting.com/mailman/listinfo/computer-go>,<mailto:computer-go-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://hosting.midvalleyhosting.com/mailman/listinfo/computer-go>,<mailto:computer-go-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: computer-go <computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: computer-go-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

drd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I don't know how to compare  this gap with GO.  If an omniscient chess
> player could win 95% of it's  games against a Bobby Fischer, how would
> that compare to "number of stones" in Go?

About 3 stones,

Christoph
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [computer-go] Modern brute force search
  - From: Chris Fant
- [computer-go] Win rate and handicap (was: Modern brute force search)
  - From: David G Doshay

Prev by Date: Re: [computer-go] Asian software
Next by Date: [computer-go] Addressing the root of the problem
Previous by thread: Re: [computer-go] Modern brute force search
Next by thread: [computer-go] Win rate and handicap (was: Modern brute force search)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread