Re: [computer-go] reply-to (was Announcement:: Second KGS Computer GoTournament)

[Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@xxxxxxx>]

kettil wrote:
> Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> >That is because `computer-go' list adds `Reply-To' MIME header.
> >This is not a recommended practice, maybe the maintainer could
> >change this?
> >
> >	http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> >
> >Paul
>
> Paying attention to that document is not recommended practice. :-)
>
>     http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html

This essay rather recommends not to write "considered harfmul"s.  In
any case, I find the one about "reply-to" non-dogmatic and having strong
arguments.  Yes, it is biased, but almost anything out there is biased.

BTW, more on-topic.  I use KMail as mail client.  It has _four_ reply
commands and _none_ of them allows me to reply to the author of a
message posted on a reply-to-munging mailing list.  If I want to do this,
I have to copy'n'paste the email address by hands.

I also believe this is not the first time we see private mails posted on
the list.  Luckily, nobody has posted a strongly offensive message that
way.  Yet.

Paul

_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/