Re: [computer-go] reply-to (was Announcement:: Second KGS ComputerGo Tournament)

[the Robot Vegetable <veg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
	I'll review the comments, and sites, and config, and see
what's up.  May be a few days, I'm very busy - I don't want to change 
things without careful consideration.

	veg, admin


On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:

> kettil wrote:
> > Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> > >That is because `computer-go' list adds `Reply-To' MIME header.
> > >This is not a recommended practice, maybe the maintainer could
> > >change this?
> > >
> > >	http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> > >
> > >Paul
> >
> > Paying attention to that document is not recommended practice. :-)
> >
> >     http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
> 
> This essay rather recommends not to write "considered harfmul"s.  In
> any case, I find the one about "reply-to" non-dogmatic and having strong
> arguments.  Yes, it is biased, but almost anything out there is biased.
> 
> BTW, more on-topic.  I use KMail as mail client.  It has _four_ reply
> commands and _none_ of them allows me to reply to the author of a
> message posted on a reply-to-munging mailing list.  If I want to do this,
> I have to copy'n'paste the email address by hands.
> 
> I also believe this is not the first time we see private mails posted on
> the list.  Luckily, nobody has posted a strongly offensive message that
> way.  Yet.
> 
> Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
> 
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/