[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: perfect players




The popular belief is that the top pros are within 4 stones of perfection, based on
some statistics about variation in final score. Top go programs right now are at
least 20 stones below the top humans, and may be close to 25 stones weaker.

Many Faces and Go4++ both play on IGS and have earned 16K* ratings. Goemate
doesn't play there, but I doubt it is more than a stone or two stronger.

At 11:41 AM 5/2/2001 -0400, Fant, Chris wrote:
It has been said by at least one chess player that they could beat a perfect
player, given a one pawn advantage.  Has this ever been tried against a
computer player?  I am interested in knowing how close computer players are
to a perfect player, how close the best human players are to the perfect
player and how close the best Go players are to the perfect player.  It is
my conjecture that human and computer chess players are very close to the
perfect player relative to how close the best Go players are to the perfect
player.  I believe that Go programs will eventually surpass human players
and go on to absolutely destroy the best of the best.  I believe this
because of the complexity of the game.  Computers can't be stopped.  They
will continue to approach perfect player performance.  What does the group
think?
David Fotland