Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Antti Huima
• Re: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Antti Huima
• Re: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Erik van der Werf
• Re: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Antti Huima
• Re: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Erik van der Werf
• Re: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Vlad Dumitrescu
• RE: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Persson, Magnus
• Re: [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Tapani Raiko
• [computer-go] An [open] question on game tree search theory
  • From: Antti Huima
• RE: [computer-go] Scalability Odd-Even Effect
  • From: David Fotland
• RE: [computer-go] RE: Scalability
  • From: David Fotland
• Re: [computer-go] Re: Scalability
  • From: Chris Fant
• Re: [computer-go] RE: Scalability
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] Re: Scalability
  • From: Don Dailey
• [computer-go] RE: Scalability
  • From: Persson, Magnus
• Re: [computer-go] Re: Scalability
  • From: Chris Fant
• [computer-go] Re: Scalability
  • From: Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Re: Scalability
  • From: Don Dailey
• [computer-go] RE: Scalability
  • From: Persson, Magnus
• [computer-go] Re: Scalability
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] Scalability Odd-Even Effect
  • From: Chris Fant
• RE: [computer-go] Scalability Odd-Even Effect
  • From: David Fotland
• Re: [computer-go] Scalability Odd-Even Effect
  • From: chrilly
• [computer-go] Scalability
  • From: Persson, Magnus
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: chrilly
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: David G Doshay
• Re: [computer-go] Symposium 'Go at the frontiers of AI'. January26, 2005 (plaintext)
  • From: Erik van der Werf
• RE: [computer-go] Tactical move generation
  • From: David Fotland
• RE: [computer-go] Tactical move generation
  • From: Anders Kierulf
• Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] Tactical move generation
  • From: Chris Fant
• Re: [computer-go] Tactical move generation
  • From: Darren Cook
• RE: [computer-go] Symposium 'Go at the frontiers of AI'. January 26,2005 (plaintext)
  • From: David Fotland
• RE: [computer-go] Tactical move generation
  • From: David Fotland
• [computer-go] Tactical move generation
  • From: Chris Fant
• Re: [computer-go] Symposium 'Go at the frontiers of AI'.January 26, 2005 (plaintext)
  • From: Tom Cooper
• Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: Peter McKenzie
• [computer-go] Symposium 'Go at the frontiers of AI'. January 26,2005 (plaintext)
  • From: Erik van der Werf
• [computer-go] Symposium 'Go at the frontiers of AI'. January 26,2005
  • From: Erik van der Werf
• Re: [computer-go] Basic PN implementation
  • From: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
• Re: [computer-go] Basic PN implementation
  • From: Chris Fant
• Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: Peter McKenzie
• Re: [computer-go] Basic PN implementation
  • From: Paul
• Re: [computer-go] Basic PN implementation
  • From: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
• Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: William Harold Newman
• Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: Maarten Mariën
• Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: Don Dailey
• Réf. : Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: jEF NEUF
• Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: Nick Wedd
• Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: Don Dailey
• [computer-go] Testing move generation and tree traversal
  • From: Peter McKenzie
• Re: FW: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] Basic PN implementation
  • From: Chris Fant
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Robin Kramer
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Don Dailey
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Robin Kramer
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: chrilly
• Re: FW: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Chris Fant
• FW: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Mark Boon
• [computer-go] re: fixed point vs floating point
  • From: Dave Dyer
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Paul Pogonyshev
• [computer-go] Basic PN implementation
  • From: Chris Fant
• FW: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Mark Boon
• RE: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Mark Boon
• [computer-go] Go++ v5
  • From: Jean-Charles
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: Heikki Levanto
• Re: [computer-go] Using floating point sounds very strange to me
  • From: chrilly
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Marco Scheurer
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: David G Doshay
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Jim O'Flaherty, Jr.
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Marco Scheurer
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: A van Kessel
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Gunnar Farnebäck
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Jay Scott
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: David G Doshay
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: David G Doshay
• [computer-go] wwg format?
  • From: Darren Cook
• [computer-go] Usefullness of pro/dan-level patterns in mid-Kyugames.
  • From: Frank de Groot
• [computer-go] lithos
  • From: chopanpan
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Jay Scott
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: David G Doshay
• FW: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Mark Boon
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: David G Doshay
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: David G Doshay
• Re: [computer-go] SlugGo approach: GNU vs.Goliath
  • From: Gunnar Farnebäck