[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: computer-go: Go4++: Passing in tsume searches.

To: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: computer-go: Go4++: Passing in tsume searches.
From: Robert Jasiek <jasiek@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:43:38 +0100
Organization: jasiek
References: <20020124174651.66485.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from a a on Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:46:51 +0100 (CET)) <20020124174651.66485.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <v04011703b8760e1f1a43@[129.128.4.18]> <00af01c1a528$eb555ec0$0200000a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Michael Reiss wrote:
> Am I the only one who's searches are clogged up with
> passes? How have other people dealt with this?

I have not dealt with it in CG yet but from my studies of kos in endgame-
like situations I can confirm the experience that passes can blow up the
calculation space enormously. Your only realistic chances are to change
the rules or to make calculation imprecise by simplifying assumptions.

--
robert jasiek

References:
- RE: computer-go: Go4++: Passing in tsume searches.
  - From: a a
- Re: computer-go: Go4++: Passing in tsume searches.
  - From: Martin Mueller
- Re: computer-go: Go4++: Passing in tsume searches.
  - From: Michael Reiss

Prev by Date: RE: computer-go: Go4++: Passing in tsume searches.
Next by Date: Re: computer-go: Go4++: Passing in tsume searches.
Previous by thread: Re: computer-go: Go4++: Passing in tsume searches.
Next by thread: RE: computer-go: Go4++: Passing in tsume searches.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread