> A professional checkersplayer such as Tinsley could play the game near
> perfect.
Yes, Tinsley was on the verge of perfect play, ...
But it's amazing how difficult this very "simple" game is...
Before Chinook had the big databases, ...
Here is the interesting point of what I am saying: Those incredible
search depths that Chinook could do, which could lose to Tinsley, were
many ply less than chess programs do right now! And yet current chess
programs are very close to the playing ability of the very best
players!
Does everyone see my point? That's why I say there must still be a
very long way to go for computer chess, and I extrapolate to GO.
not sure. are you saying with a better db, the chess programs could be much
better? and that this may be true for go?