RE: [computer-go] ICGA report

["David Fotland" <fotland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't know if it is available for download from the journal web site.
Probably not.
The position is from the 9x9 go intellect black vs gnugo.  It's not a
tactic.  It's the
strategy of sacrificing 2 stones so the other go program wastes moves
capturing them.
Since weak stones have aji, deciding when to add a move or not is a
difficult question,
even for people, and it has little to do with search.

David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: computer-go-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:computer-go-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Darren Cook
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:00 PM
> To: computer-go
> Subject: Re: [computer-go] ICGA report
> 
> 
> > Secondly, I see a very nice written report by David Fotland 
> who shows 
> > clearly that go programs still are strugling to search 
> basic tactics.
> > 
> > Not counting forced moves how many ply is the mistake seen 
> from brute 
> > force perspective when using a reasonable evaluation function?
> 
> David, is your report available for download anywhere?
> 
> Or if not, is it possible to post here the position mentioned above?
> 
> Darren
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
> 


_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/