[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[computer-go] Groups, liberties, and such
Here's my main questions, but below them I've tried to give a lot of
background for those who are interested.
Questions
----------
1. When connecting two stone chains is there any way to calculate the
new chain's liberties without iterating over all the stones? While not
simple, tracking a chain's identifier can be done in O(1) and I'm
looking for a comparably efficient solution if it exists.
2. When is an approximate number of liberties sufficient? Semai's are a
common case for tracking a larger number of liberties, but in many
cases, a pure liberty count is insufficient anyway.
3. Besides liberties dropping to zero or possibly a group having less
than N liberties (as a warning sign), what other ways do real
bots/people count liberties?
Background
-----------
I've tried to make updates from placing a new stone on the board be an
incremental, O(1) change wherever possible. I'm trying to keep this up
but some information tracking is tough to do in O(1)
Group Identifiers
------------------
I've shied away from storing an explicit group number of individual
stones on the board. When placing a stone that connects two groups, the
update would be O(min(N1,N2)) where N1 and N2 are the group sizes.
For the actual tracking of group id's, I've settled on the concept of
a disjoint set. Effectively, each group member has a pointer to a
representative member. Mergers result in some members seeing a linked
list to reach their head, but then collapse the linked list to allow
direct access. Theoretical analysis shows operations O(1) for all
practical group sizes.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjoint-set_data_structure
Liberties
----------
So far, I have not thought of a good way to handle liberties in an
efficient manner. The problem is that looking at the empty spaces
surrounding each individual stone, and summing up leads to an incorrect
value. I've started calling this incorrect value pseudo-liberties. As
an example, every stone in a hollow 3x3 square has 2 pseudo-liberties.
Summing up over the 8 stones results in 16 pseudo-liberties instead of
the correct 13 liberties. When combining two long stone chains, the
pseudo-liberties are easy to calculate incrementally, but I have no good
way to incrementally track real liberties.
As a simple example, consider the letter H formed by 7 stones.
Before adding the center stone each 3 stone wall has 8 liberties, but
share 3 liberties with its neighbor. While adding the center stone and
re-examining all of its liberties would yield the proper result of 12,
this doesn't hold in general.
Consider moving the connecting stone by one (forming the capital
letter U). Re-examining only the liberties of the connecting stone
would result in 14 liberties instead of the correct 13. Generalizing
the problem, there's no guarantee that chains can not come near each
other at different points and reduce the liberty count.
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [computer-go] Groups, liberties, and such
- Re: [computer-go] Groups, liberties, and such
- Re: [computer-go] Groups, liberties, and such
- Re: [computer-go] Groups, liberties, and such
- RE: [computer-go] Groups, liberties, and such