Erik van der Werf wrote:
Xavier Combelle wrote:As a future contestant, I prefer the GTP solution, but the decision is for the organizer, what do they exactly want ? If any organizer could answer me, I would be pleased.
Nick Wedd wrote:
> I want more entrants, and happy entrants.
Same here, for the last Computer Olympiads our primary goal was to make it easy to participate. Therefore we did not want to enforce any specific communication protocol.
Personally, however, I do recommend supporting (not enforcing) GMP because it can help to gain time.
It gain time for the organizer, but add difficulties for new entrants
"CGoban 1 is no longer under active development."
In the last tournament there were several participants who implemented GTP and used it with GoGui as an interface. In principle this is nice because GoGui can connect to other programs over a serial cable using GMP. Unfortunately there were some (Java related) problems to get the GMP bridge to work properly, and therefore many games had to be played manually. It would be nice if this could be fixed. Moreover, I think it would be nice if the old cgoban would be extended with GTP support.
BTW How do people feel about the increased opportunities for foul play in network environments. It may be significantly harder for tournament organizers to deal with (accusations of) foul play...Personnaly, if I thouht develop a program (and I'm seriously thinking about to do so),