Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: computer-go: relative strengths chess vs go, (continued)
  • Re: computer-go: relative strengths chess vs go, Don Dailey
• computer-go: Go Devil, Don Dailey
  • Re: computer-go: Go Devil, Don Dailey
  • Re: computer-go: Go Devil, Ray Tayek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: computer-go: Go Devil, Vincent Diepeveen
    • Re: computer-go: Go Devil, Don Dailey
  • Re: computer-go: Go Devil, Compgo123
    • Re: computer-go: Go Devil, Don Dailey
      • Re: computer-go: Go Devil, Amol Dharmadhikari
      • RE: computer-go: Go Devil, jliu
  • Re: computer-go: Go Devil, Vincent Diepeveen
• Re: computer-go: FOST/ ING this year, Stefan Mertin
• Re: computer-go: FOST/ ING this year?, Stefan Mertin
  • Re: computer-go: FOST/ ING this year?, Nick Wedd
• Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Heikki Levanto
  • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Fred Hapgood
    • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, William Harold Newman
      • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Don Dailey
      • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, David and Patricia
      • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Rich Brown
    • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Don Dailey
    • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Don Dailey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Heikki Levanto
    • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Fred Hapgood
  • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, j.corbella
  • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Michael D Richard
    • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Don Dailey
      • Re: computer-go: Brains & Software, Jeffrey Sorenson
• Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), Andre Engels
  • Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), Rich Brown
    • Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), Rich Brown
    • computer-go: Complexity & SW, Fred Hapgood
      • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Mark Boon
      • Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW, Stefan Mertin
      • computer-go: A 9 stone game against the demo of FunGo2000, Magnus Persson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), Ka8vpl
  • Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), Compgo123
    • Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), Amol Dharmadhikari
    • Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), Robert Jasiek
      • Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), Don Dailey
  • Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), birk
    • Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), Don Dailey
• computer-go: Deep search = worst play ?, Joan Pons Semelis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: computer-go: Deep search = worst play ?, Vincent Diepeveen
  • Re: computer-go: Deep search = worst play ?, Joan Pons Semelis
    • Re: computer-go: Deep search = worst play ?, Don Dailey
• computer-go: Programming languages, Heikki Levanto
  • Re: computer-go: Programming languages, David Fotland
• Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued, Heikki Levanto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued, David Fotland
    • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued, Mark Boon
      • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued, Don Dailey
      • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued, Christian Nentwich
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued, Mark Boon
    • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued, William Harold Newman
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued, Heikki Levanto
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued, Heikki Levanto
    • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued, Mark Boon
• computer-go: Insight of a human, Vincent Diepeveen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human, Heikki Levanto
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human, Don Dailey
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human, Don Dailey
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human, Heikki Levanto
    • computer-go: Sucessful Computer Go Characterization, Matt Gokey
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human, Heikki Levanto
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human, Mark Boon
    • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human, Matt Gokey
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human, Nicol N. Schraudolph
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human, Joan Pons Semelis
  • Re: computer-go: Insight of a human, Mark Boon
• computer-go: How much can Go programs be assisted by faster hardware?, Don Wagner
• Re: computer-go: FPGA vs. Clusters, Vincent Diepeveen
• computer-go: FPGA, Compgo123
  • Re: computer-go: FPGA, David Fotland
    • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Kurt Thorn Perkins
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Don Dailey
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, David Fotland
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Don Dailey
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Dave Dyer
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Don Dailey
      • RE: computer-go: FPGA, jliu
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Andre Engels
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Mark Boon
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Don Dailey
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Don Dailey
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Mark Boon
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Don Dailey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Vincent Diepeveen
    • computer-go: FPGA vs. Clusters, Magnus Persson
  • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Vincent Diepeveen
  • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Compgo123
  • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Vincent Diepeveen
  • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Mike Gherrity
    • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Dave Dyer
      • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Don Dailey
    • Re: computer-go: FPGA, David Fotland
    • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Don Dailey
  • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Mike Gherrity
    • Re: computer-go: FPGA, Don Dailey
    • Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA), Matt Gokey