Mail Index
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: computer-go: Please stop this pointless and blasphemous discussion !!!
From
: Robert Jasiek
Re: computer-go: Please stop this pointless and blasphemous discussion !!!
From
: Dave Dyer
Re: computer-go: relative strengths chess vs go
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Please stop this pointless and blasphemous discussion !!!
From
: Don Dailey
computer-go: proof
From
: Vincent Diepeveen
Re: computer-go: relative strengths chess vs go
From
: Barry Phease
computer-go: Please stop this pointless and blasphemous discussion !!!
From
: Roland G.
Re: computer-go: Go Devil
From
: Amol Dharmadhikari
Re: computer-go: relative strengths chess vs go
From
: Don Dailey
computer-go: relative strengths chess vs go
From
: Vincent Diepeveen
Re: computer-go: Go Devil
From
: Vincent Diepeveen
Re: computer-go: Go Devil
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Go Devil
From
: Compgo123
Re: computer-go: Go Devil
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Go Devil
From
: Vincent Diepeveen
Re: computer-go: Go Devil
From
: Don Dailey
computer-go: Go Devil
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: birk
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Robert Jasiek
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Robert Jasiek
Re: computer-go: Brains & Software
From
: Jeffrey Sorenson
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Michael D Richard
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Rich Brown
Re: computer-go: FOST/ ING this year
From
: Stefan Mertin
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: David and Patricia
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Don Dailey
computer-go: A 9 stone game against the demo of FunGo2000
From
: Magnus Persson
Re: computer-go: FOST/ ING this year?
From
: Nick Wedd
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: j.corbella
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: William Harold Newman
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Stefan Mertin
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Fred Hapgood
Re: computer-go: FOST/ ING this year?
From
: Stefan Mertin
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Heikki Levanto
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Fred Hapgood
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Heikki Levanto
Re: computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Mark Boon
computer-go: Complexity & SW
From
: Fred Hapgood
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Amol Dharmadhikari
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Compgo123
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Rich Brown
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Rich Brown
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Amol Dharmadhikari
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Ka8vpl
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Andre Engels
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Andre Engels
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Freek van Keulen
Re: computer-go: Deep search = worst play ?
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Deep search = worst play ?
From
: Joan Pons Semelis
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Mark Boon
RE: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Sam Sloan
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Matthew John Saffell
RE: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Amol Dharmadhikari
Re: computer-go: Deep search = worst play ?
From
: Vincent Diepeveen
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Nick Wedd
computer-go: Deep search = worst play ?
From
: Joan Pons Semelis
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Joan Pons Semelis
RE: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: jliu
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Matt Gokey
Re: computer-go: Good Play (was FPGA)
From
: Matt Gokey
computer-go: Sucessful Computer Go Characterization
From
: Matt Gokey
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Nicol N. Schraudolph
Re: computer-go: Programming languages
From
: David Fotland
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued
From
: Mark Boon
computer-go: Programming languages
From
: Heikki Levanto
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued
From
: Heikki Levanto
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued
From
: Heikki Levanto
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued
From
: William Harold Newman
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued
From
: Christian Nentwich
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued
From
: Mark Boon
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued
From
: Mark Boon
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Mark Boon
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: Andre Engels
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued
From
: David Fotland
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Heikki Levanto
RE: computer-go: FPGA
From
: jliu
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human continued
From
: Heikki Levanto
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Heikki Levanto
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Heikki Levanto
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: Don Dailey
computer-go: Insight of a human
From
: Vincent Diepeveen
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: Vincent Diepeveen
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: Joan Pons Semelis
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: aj c
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: Vlad Dumitrescu
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: Vlad Dumitrescu
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: Don Dailey
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: Vincent Diepeveen
Re: computer-go: FPGA
From
: Don Dailey
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.11